How about housing over streets? Or railway tracks?
Now, of course, we don’t have any railway tracks that we could build over in Vancouver… Or do we?
What about Arbutus?
Now, I know what you’re thinking… “Now he wants to ruin our future greenway.”
In fact, I love the idea of the greenway and I think the City did the right thing in buying the land, it was a reasonable deal.
But let’s develop certain portions of that greenway, especially where it hits 41st Avenue and other key streets, but keep the corridor. Keep the greenway, and the space for pedestrians.
And I know that you’re now saying, “But there isn’t enough room.” But there is enough room because, remember, the City owns the street on each side of the greenway. So instead of having 60 feet, you actually have 120 feet to work with.
Now, where we could be reallycreative is in terms of skinny streets, like the idea that won the Mayor’s affordable housing task force competition for innovative solutions. Take a look at this proposal to take a wide street in San Francisco [pictured above] and build down the middle of it.
So you have a car lane and a narrow pedestrian sidewalk on one side of the new building, and the same on the other. And yes, you’ve got a very tight space between cars and pedestrians, and some people are going to be very upset by this – but you can stagger the windows, you can do things to improve it. But what an intriguing idea.
My point is to say, there are lots of ways that we can start to make better use of space. And let’s start using the public lands that we’ve got.
Next time: Building on green spaces and over water